Letter to the Lafayette City Council

Letter to the Lafayette City Council


January 5, 2018


Re: A community rights legal strategy


Dear Councilors:


After attending the important Council meeting on Tuesday, January 2, 2018, I wanted to send you my
public input on the issue of retaining CELDF as legal counsel, as I believe some significant facts and
insights were omitted from the public comments. I hope you will find my remarks informative and
helpful in the future public forum that was allow further public discussion on this matter of grave
concern to our community.


First, I want to thank you all for your service in holding this difficult public office, especially at this time.
I have only attended a fraction of the meetings that have interest to me, but I can only imagine
what patience and fortitude it must take to endure all the meetings and service which you do as
part of your job. Though I sometimes disagree with the decisions reached, I do appreciate the
hard work you do in reaching them.


To let you know more about the parts of me that is relevant for this message: I was part
of the original founding members of East Boulder County United, and was deeply involved in the
selection of CELDF in helping us to draft the Lafayette Community Rights Act. I was part of the
defendants in the August 22, 2013 hearing in the Council chambers, when COGA’s lawyers
attempted to stop EBCU from collecting signatures to get that measure on the Lafayette ballot.
I was part of the founding meeting of the Colorado Community Rights Network (COCRN) meeting
in Fort Collins in 2014. I have remained in contact with EBCU, and with COCRN as I believe this
is a cause worth fighting for, with a deeply democratic purpose to improve our government at all
levels, and to protect our environmental quality at the community level. I am speaking to you as
an individual, however, not on behalf of any organization.


I hold an MA in Economics from the University of Pennsylvania, and an MS in Telecommunications
from the University of Colorado-Boulder. I have taught an online course in environmental economics
at Front Range Community College since 2009 as a part-time job; my full time jobs have been in
website and database development. I have lived in Lafayette since 2004, and am deeply committed
to helping raise awareness of the need for citizen involvement to protect the environment.


What I will share with you in the rest of this message are the compelling reasons why I believe
Lafayette should seek CELDF’s help in its legal strategy. This represents not just an opportunity
for Lafayette as a community to protect itself from an unwanted and invasive destructive industry,
but an opportunity to break new legal ground that is much needed in US environmental law.


The most compelling reason is that community rights, as defined in the Lafayette Community
Rights Act (which can be read in its entirety on the Lafayette town website) has simply not yet
been tried in court, but that is exactly where it needs to go to be truly tested by the judiciary.
There were three very significant parts of that Act, namely: (1) we banned oil and gas extraction
within the city limits, (2) we gave rights to Nature, and (3) we said that corporations are not people,
in the the sense of the infamous Citizens United SCOTUS decision. As you know, Lafayette was
promptly sued by COGA, on the very narrow clause of the banning of oil and gas extraction and
transport; but they studiously avoided mentioning community rights.


This was clearly the case in the COGA lawsuit, which I discuss in this blog post:
Community Rights: Still Waiting for its Day in Court. In a nutshell, the COGA lawsuit simply
ignored how the Community Rights Act defines the rights by which it banned oil and gas extraction.
If you read the brief by COGA (see the entire brief here) and the judgement issued by the judge
(see that judgement here), you will not find community rights mentioned anywhere. Doesn’t that
seem strange to you? The Community Rights Act goes to great pains to define these rights,
based directly on our constitutional rights, and why the declaration of these rights is necessary.
There are nine sections to that act, with eleven subsections under the final section, about a four
page document, 1,460 words to be exact, all which was flatly ignored. Since COGA ignored it, the
judge in her judgement could ignore it. This fact -- that an important lawsuit against our city
does not even mention the basis on which the Act is based -- is a huge elephant in the room.
It is  unconscionable and cries out to be redressed. EBCU tried to appeal that decision, but
did not have the resources to do so; and the Lafayette Council at the time decided against
making an appeal, unfortunately.


Another compelling reason for the Council to invite CELDF, and force communtiy rights into our
legal framework: I strongly suspect that it has been an intentional strategy by COGA to not
mention the words “community rights” in a courtroom because they want to avoid this at all costs.
Why? Because they are afraid that they will be seen as the aggressors against those rights,
which they are, and that the tide of public opinion will begin to shift against them. I would like
to see the Lafayette Council challenge COGA to a public debate on the matter, hear their answers,
and let the public decide who is right.


Even the decision by the Colorado Supreme Court in May 2016 (such as this article describes,
Colorado Supreme Court Rules Against Cities' Fracking Limits) does not alter my argument here.
That case only took up the appeals by Fort Collins and Longmont, but their strategy was not based
on community rights such our case in Lafayette. What is really needed is a sincere and open
consideration of community rights by the Colorado Supreme Court.


The next compelling reason for the Lafayette Council to bring CELDF to the table is that fighting
for the environment at the community level is the last hope of the American people to protect their
environment. This turnaround in the law must begin at the local levels, because the higher levels of
regulatory authorities have all been captured by the industries they regulate -- with our own COGCC
a poster child in evidence of this.  It may come as a shock to hear me say that the entire edifice of
environmental law is a grand facade, a veritable Potemkin village, which has failed to protect the
environment from the very day the laws were passed; but these are not my words. This is
demonstrably shown in the authoritative work, Nature’s Trust, where Dr Mary Wood demolishes
with undeniable and voluminous evidence with all the skill that a judicial scholar can bring to
bear on why this is the case. Dr Wood was an
invited distinguished lecturer at the CU Law School on September 20, 2017, where I
learned about her important work and distinguished career. If you want to see the real plight of
US environmental law, I invite you to read her book.


The last compelling reason is global climate change. If we wish to begin to turn our civilization around,
and begin the hard work of mitigating and adapting to the changes in our global climate, which are
already upon us, then we must start fighting this legal and political fight...here...now.


If you would but realize this...that Lafayette has the opportunity to be a real spark of hope in fighting
the corporate dominance of our legal system, our regulatory agencies, and indeed of our own
communities, forcing their deeds upon us against the will of the people, then take this step: invite
CELDF to help us, make this meeting as public as public can be. You will not regret it, and it will
make the vast majority of Lafayette citizens, and all US citizens fighting to protect their environment,
proud that you did so.


Very Sincerely,
Rick Casey
1118 Centaur Circle, apt D
Lafayette, CO


References:


Lafayette Community Rights Act, passed Nov 5, 2013, from municipal code on city website








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Community Rights: Still Waiting for its Day in Court

Nature's Trust: a new paradigm for environmental law...and here's a great quote...